When someone dies in Japan, cremation is almost always the only option. More than 99% of deaths follow this practice, shaped by a combination of cultural norms, limited land, and postwar public health policy.

For the growing number of Muslim residents, however, this clashes with what is permitted under their faith. As the country’s Muslim population continues to increase, that tension has become harder to ignore.

Government assesses ability to meet residents’ burial needs

On paper, burial is not illegal in Japan, and a small number of cemeteries do allow it. In practice, however, options are extremely limited.

Fewer than a dozen facilities nationwide currently accept Muslim burials, and none are located west of the Chūgoku region. That’s a significant gap given that many foreign workers and their families live in areas such as Kansai and Kyushu. For Muslim families who have made Japan their home, that leaves few realistic choices.

For observant Muslims, burial is not simply a preference: it’s a religious obligation. Islamic tradition requires the body to be washed, wrapped in a simple white shroud, and buried as soon as possible, typically within 24 hours, facing Mecca. Cremation is strictly prohibited.

In response, the Japanese government has begun surveying burial practices across the country. Since January 2026, it has asked 129 prefectures and major cities about their cemetery regulations and whether they can accommodate forms of burial beyond cremation. The effort is part of a broader set of policies aimed at managing Japan’s growing foreign resident population.

As a result, some families must transport bodies long distances within Japan to find a suitable burial site, while others are forced to repatriate their loved ones abroad at significant cost. In both cases, what should be a private moment of mourning becomes a logistical and financial burden.

Where policy meets resistance 

Efforts to establish Muslim burial sites have met with local resistance more than once.

In Hiji Town, Oita Prefecture, a plan to build a cemetery for Muslim burials drew national attention – and not all of it positive. A local Islamic association had reached an agreement to acquire municipal land for the project, with support from nearby residents. The number of plots was capped, restrictions on who could be buried there were clearly defined, and environmental safeguards, including groundwater testing, were put in place.

Despite these measures, opposition grew. Some residents in neighboring areas raised concerns about possible contamination of local water sources. Others submitted complaints that included discriminatory language, prompting warnings from legal experts that parts of the backlash could constitute hate speech.

Similar patterns of misinformation and backlash have appeared in other contexts, including false claims targeting Muslim communities that have led to waves of complaints against local governments. Some rhetoric has extended beyond local concerns, with commentators suggesting that Muslim residents who require burial should return their deceased to their countries of origin. Critics say that overlooks the reality that many Muslims in Japan are long-term residents, and in some cases, citizens.

The issue quickly became political. In the town’s 2024 mayoral election, a candidate opposing the cemetery defeated the incumbent by a wide margin. Shortly after taking office, the new mayor reversed course and refused to proceed with the land sale, effectively halting the project.

A similar pattern unfolded in Sakuragawa City, Ibaraki Prefecture. There, a Buddhist-affiliated religious organization had applied to develop a burial site intended for Muslim use, working in collaboration with Muslim groups. After local opposition, including complaints that residents had not been adequately consulted about the plan, the organization withdrew its application in early 2024.

Together, these cases highlight a recurring problem. Even when burial is legally permitted, even when organizers take steps to address local concerns, projects often stall and fall apart before they have a chance to move forward.

A system under strain

As Japan continues to expand its foreign workforce, this problem is likely to become more pronounced.

By the end of 2024, the number of foreign workers in the country had reached roughly 2.3 million – nearly triple what it was a decade earlier. A significant portion of these workers come from Muslim-majority countries, particularly Indonesia. Many are employed in sectors facing acute labor shortages, such as caregiving, construction, and food processing.

With more Muslims calling Japan home, the government’s decision to survey burial practices reflects a growing awareness of the issue. However, it has largely been framed within the context of foreign resident policy. Treating it primarily as a matter concerning foreigners, rather than one of religious accommodation, shapes how solutions are discussed, and whether they gain acceptance.

In the meantime, the lack of accessible burial options continues to affect families at a deeply personal level. Funeral arrangements that might otherwise be handled locally instead require coordination across prefectures or international borders, adding time, cost, and uncertainty during moments of grief.

Uneven progress

Not all efforts to address the issue have stalled. In some areas, local governments and organizations have begun exploring ways to expand burial options, even in the face of public opposition.

In Miyagi Prefecture, Governor Murai Yoshihiro announced plans to pursue an earth-burial cemetery intended to serve the region’s growing foreign population. The proposal drew hundreds of complaints shortly after it was made public, many expressing concern or opposition. Even so, the prefectural government has indicated it intends to continue examining the plan.

Elsewhere, smaller-scale solutions have emerged with less visibility. In Kyoto, a temple-run cemetery quietly began offering a limited number of plots for Muslim burials after recognizing the shortage. While the number of available spaces remains small, it represents a rare example of an existing institution adapting to meet a specific religious need.

These contrasting approaches suggest that change is possible, but uneven. While some communities move to accommodate new residents, others remain hesitant, leaving the overall landscape fragmented and uncertain.

A widening gap

For now, the gap remains. Burial may be legally permitted in Japan, but for many Muslim residents, it is still difficult to access in practice. As the population continues to grow, that disconnect is becoming harder to overlook.

Japan has spent much of the past decade expanding its foreign workforce to meet economic needs. Less attention has been paid to what it means to support those workers beyond the workplace, including how they practice their beliefs and how their families navigate moments of loss.

The government’s survey may be a first step toward understanding the issue. Whether it leads to meaningful change will depend on how that understanding is translated into policy – and whether local communities are willing to accept it.

In the end, the question is not simply whether burial is allowed in Japan. It’s whether it will be realistically possible.

Sources

ムスリム土葬、全国の実態調査　政府、外国人政策巡り自治体に 共同通信 (via Yahoo!ニュース)

イスラム墓地不足、外国人材受容の壁に　動く県や寺も 日本経済新聞

「なぜ土葬はダメ？」 多文化共生を問われる日本社会 nippon.com

「ヘイトスピーチ」との指摘も…イスラム教徒向け土葬墓地　町などに差別的言葉含む反対意見相次ぐ TOSオンライン

日出町長選挙　無所属新人・安部徹也氏が初当選　イスラム土葬墓地「反対の姿勢を貫きたい」 TOSオンライン

「土地売却しない」日出町が別府ムスリム教会に伝える　新町長が方針転換　イスラム土葬墓地問題 TOSオンライン

イスラム土葬墓地「埋葬は焼骨」条例に明記求める住民陳情　町議会委員会で「不採択」大分県日出町 TOSオンライン

宗教法人別府ムスリム教会 土葬墓地について 日出町公式サイト

【共生リアル―新たな隣人たち】日出町のムスリム土葬墓地計画頓挫１年、遠い根本解決　政府に対応求める声強まる 大分合同新聞プレミアムオンライン Gate

「日本で土葬はできない」ってウソ？ホント？　ムスリム対応で物議…ネット情報の真偽を調べる 河北新報オンライン